Speaker: Tilo Hartmann @thartmann & Miguel Barreda
Affiliation: VU Amsterdam & Telefónica Research, Barcelona
Title: One world? Narrative Presence in Stories vs. Sensory Presence in Immersive Environments
Abstract (long version below): Media comparisons stand in a long tradition (e.g., Lessing 1766), with some scholars focusing on how the same phenomena can occur in different guises in various media, while maintaining essential characteristics; and other studies aiming to identifying unique qualities of the medium (e.g., in Chatman 1980, What Novels Can Do That Films Can’t (And Vice Versa). VR and literature seem total opposites; here we will explore how they are, and how they are not. The symposium stimulates a cross fertilization, by coupling empirical research on these media, thus generating new insights, and deepen our understanding of key concepts such as narrative, embodiment, transformative experiences, immersion, presence, and transportation.
Summary: That users get immersed in a narrative (Moore & Green, 2020), feel transported to (Green, 2004; Green & Brock, 2002) or engaged in (Busselle & Bilandzic, 2008, 2009), and even located or present in the story’s world (Busselle & Bilandzic, 2009, ““narrative presence””), is a hallmark of the narrative experience. Interestingly, as scholars noted before (e.g., Moore & Green, 2020; Pianzola et al., 2020; Pianzola et al., 2022; Schubert & Crusious, 2002), the sensation of presence is also the key experience provided by new immersive technologies like Virtual Reality (Haans & IJsselsteijn, 2012; Hartmann & Hofer, 2022; Slater, 2009). But are these two types of presence identical? To address this question, the present presentation proceeds in three steps: First, it reviews the technological and psychological origins, experiential qualities (“qualia”), and general effects of both types of presence experiences, and reviews an integrative account proposed by Pianzola et al (2021, 2022). Second, it widens this theoretical synthesis by positioning presence, either evoked by narratives or by immersive technologies, within users’ general dualistic aesthetic experience (Hartmann & Hofer, 2022). Third, the presentation highlights the practical boundaries of simultaneously fostering both types of presence in a single media encounter, as it is for example envisioned by VR storytelling (e.g., Barreda et al., in press). In summary, the presentation provides further insights into how two previously separately discussed yet similarly labelled phenomena might be integrated in order to reveal a more general, cross-modality, theoretical view on how users experience mediated representations.
Barreda, M., Hartmann, T., & Bowman, N. D. (in press). Merging presence and narrative engagement: Is VR storytelling the response to the challenges of climate change communication? In N. D. Bowman (Ed.), Emerging issues for emerging technologies: informed provocations for theorizing media futures Peter Lang.
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259.
Busselle, R. W., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255–280. Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement | Communication Theory | Oxford Academic
Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye. Transportation imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact.Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). Erlbaum.
Haans, A., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2012). Embodiment and telepresence: Toward a comprehensive theoretical framework. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 211–218. Embodiment and telepresence: Toward a comprehensive theoretical framework✩ | Interacting with Computers | Oxford Academic
Hartmann, T., & Hofer, M. (2022). I know it is not real (and that matters): Media awareness vs. presence in a parallel processing account of the VR experience. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 694048. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.694048
Moore, M. M., & Green, M. C. (2020). Immersion. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0059
Pianzola, F., Riva, G., Kukkonen, K., & Mantovani, F. (2022). Am I present in imaginary worlds? Intentions, actions, and flow in mediated experiences and fiction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, e293. Am I present in imaginary worlds? Intentions, actions, and flow in mediated experiences and fiction | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core
Pianzola, F., Riva, G., Kukkonen, K., & Mantovani, F. (under review). Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing. Manuscript submitted for publication. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13193.2
Schubert, T. & Crusious, J. (2002). Five theses on the book problem: Presence in books, film and VR. PRESENCE 2002 - 5th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Porto. 2002.
Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behavior in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138.